This article is part of the supplement: 1st Scientific Meeting of the Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society .

Oral presentation

Diagnosis of head & neck malignancy using fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging

Christian Stephan Betz¹, Thomas Makriniotis¹, Herbert Stepp², Waseem Jerjes³, Tahwinder Upile³, Colin Hopper³ and Andreas Leunig¹

¹  Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Marchioninistr, Munich, Germany

²  Laser-Research Laboratory, LIFE Center, Ludwig Maximilian University, Marchioninistr, Munich, Germany

³  Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University College London Hospital, Mortimer Market, London, UK

corresponding author email

from 1^st Scientific Meeting of the Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society
London, UK. 14 March 2009

Head & Neck Oncology 2009, 1(Suppl 1):O4doi:10.1186/1758-3284-1-S1-O4

The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/1/S1/O4

Published:

28 July 2009

© 2009 Betz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Oral presentation

Upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) carcinomas continue to be the 5^th most common cancer. Early diagnosis is often delayed as tumour precursors or early cancers are hardly visible and not picked up by common imaging methods. Fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging seems able to improve the detection and delimitation of these lesions.

Fluorescence diagnostic methods usually pick up a "mixed bag" of signals from endogenous fluorophores such as tryptophan, collagen, elastin, NADH and FAD. As some of these show a tumour specific distribution, this can be exploited to distinguish tissues in vivo. The fluorescence contrast is even slightly enhanced by using exogenously applied fluorescent markers or their precursors (e.g., 5-aminolevulinic acid induced Protoporphyrin IX). Even though the sensitivity to detect malignant lesions seems to be improved by combining fluorescence diagnostic methods with normal inspection according to the literature and to our own experience, the methods are rather unspecific as chronic inflammations cause results similar to neoplastic disease.

Recent advances include the possibility to extract true spectra of single fluorophores ("intrinsic spectra") by mathematically eliminating the undesired influences of scattering and absorption. As well, tumour-specific enzymes are about to be specifically targeted by fluorescent markers (so called "smart probes") in order to improve both sensitivity and specificity.

Due to the lack of specificity, fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging are so far mostly feasible for screening purposes. If combined with other optical techniques such as ESS or OCT, however, a comprehensive non-invasive tissue diagnosis seems possible.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!