<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Head &amp; Neck Oncology - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Head &amp; Neck Oncology</description>
        <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/13" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/22">
        <title>Head and neck cancers in France: an analysis of the hospital medical information system (PMSI) database</title>
        <description>Background:
With 16005 new cases and 5406 related deaths in 2005, France is particularly concerned by Head and Neck (H&amp;N) cancers. In addition to tobacco and alcohol, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) has been reported as a risk factor for H&amp;N cancers. The literature on the burden of these cancers in Europe is scarce. This study was performed to assess the medical and economical burden of hospitalisations for H&amp;N cancers in France.
Methods:
The French national hospital database, in which admissions to public and private hospitals are recorded, was retrospectively analysed to assess the annual number of patients hospitalised for H&amp;N cancers and associated hospital costs from the healthcare payer perspective. ICD-10 codes (16 codes classified as oral cavity, oropharynx, pharynx, salivary glands and larynx) were used to extract admissions for these cancers. Hospital stays, chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions were extracted to assess patients&apos; management. Costs of admissions were obtained from French official tariffs.
Results:
In 2007, there were 36268 patients hospitalised for H&amp;N cancers, of whom 81% were men, corresponding to 60200 hospital stays and 287846 sessions of chemo- or radio-therapy. Oropharynx cancer was the most frequent (28% of patients), followed by oral cavity cancer (25% of patients). The peak of frequency was observed in the 55-59 years age group. Patients were mainly treated in medicine (48%) and surgery (23%) units. Mean annual cost per patient ranged from 2764 to 7673 euros leading to a total hospital cost of 323 millions euros in 2007 (including hospitalization and expensive drugs). With 26% of H&amp;N cancers attributable to HPV infections, 9430 patients were hospitalized due to HPV-related H&amp;N cancers, representing 138 million euros in 2007.
Conclusion:
Even without taking into account the rehabilitation costs, the hospital burden of H&amp;N cancers is considerable.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Jean Lacau St Guily</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isabelle Borget</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandre Vainchtock</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vanessa Remy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire Takizawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-22</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/21">
        <title>C-reactive protein levels: a prognostic marker for patients with head and neck cancer?</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent advances in understanding complex tumor interactions have led to the discovery of an association between inflammation and cancer, in particular for colon and lung cancer, but only a very few have dealt with oral cancer. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the significance of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a parameter for development of lymph node metastases or recurrence.Materials and methodsIn 278 patients with oral cancer, preoperative CRP levels were compared with development of recurrence and metastasis.
Results:
In 27 patients from the normal CRP group, and in 21 patients from the elevated CRP group, local recurrence was observed. Concerning lymph node metastases, 37 patients were in the normal group and 9 patients in the elevated CRP group. No significant correlation could be found between elevated CRP levels and metastasis (p = 0.468) or recurrence (p = 0.137).
Conclusion:
Our findings do not appear to support a correlation between preoperative CRP levels and development of recurrence or metastases. In further studies, CRP levels in precancerous lesions and in Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) positive patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) should be studied.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Astrid Kruse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Luebbers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Klaus Graetz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-21</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/20">
        <title>Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients with T1-T2 glottic carcinoma: retrospective analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
To assess the results for local control (LC) and survival in patients with early-stage glottic cancer (GC) who were treated by radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy.
Methods:
Fifty-eight patients with T1-T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis who were treated between 2001 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Potential prognostic factors for LC were evaluated by univariate analysis.
Results:
The 5-year LC rate in all patients was 84.3%. The overall 5-year LC rates for patients with T1a, Tb, and T2 GC were 85.9%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. Of the 58 patients, eight developed recurrent disease at the primary site, and one had lymph node recurrences on the neck. In the final analysis, the total laryngectomy-free survival rate was 93% at five years, and the ultimate LC rates for T1a, Tb, and T2 were 100%, 90.9%, and 95.2%, respectively. 
In a univariate analysis of 55 patients, there was no statistical significance between the LC rate for RT alone and that for chemoradiation. Only two patients died of laryngeal carcinoma, and one died of intercurrent disease. Fifty-five patients were living disease-free at the end of the study period. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for all patients was 88.1%, and the 5-year OS rates for T1a, Tb, and T2 were 91.6%, 77.8%, and 89.9%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The retrospective analysis showed a high rate of LC and larynx preservation in patients with T1-T2 GC by means of RT with or without chemotherapy. There was, however, no statistical difference in LC rates for the two types of therapy.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Naoki Hirasawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshiyuki Itoh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shunichi Ishihara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Seiji Kubota</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Junji Itoh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yasushi Fujimoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tsutomu Nakashima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shinji Naganawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/19">
        <title>FDG-PET staging and importance of lymph node SUV in head and neck cancer</title>
        <description>ObjectivesThe role of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) in the staging of head and neck cancer (HNC) is unclear. The NCCN guidelines do not recommend FDG-PET as a part of standard workup. The purpose of this report is to examine the role of FDG-PET imaging in altering management and providing prognostic information for HNC.
Methods:
Retrospective review of HNC patients who had a staging FDG-PET scan performed at either Thomas Jefferson University or University of Kansas Medical Center between the years 2001 and 2007. A total of 212 PET scans were performed in patients who went on to receive radiotherapy.
Results:
The median follow-up time for all patients was 469 days. The PPV and NPV of PET imaging to correctly identify lymph node status was 94% and 89% respectively. Lymph nodes with extracapsular extension (ECE) had higher SUVs than nodes without ECE, 11.0 vs. 5.0 (p &lt; 0.0007). Maximum SUV for the primary tumor &gt; 8.0 was predictive of worse overall survival (p &lt; 0.045), while the SUV of the lymph nodes was predictive for distant recurrence at one year--with a mean SUV value of 10.4 for patients with distant failure vs. 7.0 without (p &lt; 0.05).
Conclusions:
FDG-PET staging in head and neck cancer has good positive and negative predictive values in determining lymph node status. The maximum SUV of the primary tumor is predictive of overall survival. This is the first report to find that the SUV of a lymph node is predictive for ECE and also for distant recurrence.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Kubicek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Collin Champ</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Fogh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fen Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eashwer Reddy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Intenzo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reginald Dusing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mitchell Machtay</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/18">
        <title>Living related hemi-face skin transplant using radial forearm free flap for a xeroderma pigmentosa patient: early outcome</title>
        <description>IntroductionXeroderma pigmentosa (XP) is a hereditary disease characterized by deficient repair of DNA damage that occurred on exposure of the skin to ultraviolet irradiation. The affected children have a propensity to develop multiple skin cancers mainly in the face and eventually die before the age of 20.HypothesisAllograft replacement of facial skin by a healthy skin from normal person might decrease the incidence of skin cancer development, the number of surgical procedures, and eventually might improve the survival of these miserable patients.
Methods:
As Cadaveric organs are unavailable in our country. After approval from the ethical committee, confirmed agreement of the donor and the patient&apos;s guardian, a radial forearm free flap was transplanted from an ABO compatible mother to her 5 year old daughter with XP. The mother had an older daughter died from the same disease at the age of 14. The flap replaced skin of the hemi face that developed precancerous lesions. The girl was kept on adjusted doses of immunosuppressive drugs.
Results:
The flap survived, wounds healed uneventfully. The flap developed a reddish spot one and half month following transplant where baseline skin biopsy was taken. In the fifth months the girl presented with bad non salvageable rejection that ended up loosing the flap. On long term follow up, the girl started to develop skin lesion on the virgin half of the face. Our early cosmetic result replacing half of the facial skin was very promising. In addition the girl did not develop skin lesions in the operated site.
Conclusion:
Our early cosmetic result was very promising. In addition to this, the girl did not develop skin lesions in the operated side of the face</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Ayman Amin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mahmoud Bassiouny</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kareem Sallam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Galal Ghally</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hanaa El-Karaksy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alaa El-Haddad</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/17">
        <title>Correction: Primary adenomyoepithelioma of tonsil</title>
        <description>In our publication, Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:7, we used several points and sentences from other publications and failed to cite a few important sources. Ning Wang, who prepared the first draft of the manuscript, and Dr. Juan Ren, the corresponding author, would like to apologize to the authors of those publications as well as the other authors of this article. They would like to make this correction by citing the appropriate references as listed below.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Juan Ren</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Liping Song</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Qiang Dang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xiaozhi Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shi-Wen Jiang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guanjun Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ning Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zi Liu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jiansheng Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yi Lisa Hwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zongfang Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xinhan Zhao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuan Liu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/16">
        <title>Skull base approaches in neurosurgery</title>
        <description>The skull base surgery is one of the most demanding surgeries. There are different structures that can be injured easily, by operating in the skull base. It is very important for the neurosurgeon to choose the right approach in order to reach the lesion without harming the other intact structures. Due to the pioneering work of Cushing, Hirsch, Yasargil, Krause, Dandy and other dedicated neurosurgeons, it is possible to address the tumor and other lesions in the anterior, the mid-line and the posterior cranial base. With the transsphenoidal, the frontolateral, the pterional and the lateral suboccipital approach nearly every region of the skull base is exposable.In the current state many different skull base approaches are described for various neurosurgical diseases during the last 20 years. The selection of an approach may differ from country to country, e.g., in the United States orbitozygomaticotomy for special lesions of the anterior skull base or petrosectomy for clivus meningiomas, are found more frequently than in Europe.The reason for writing the review was the question: Are there keyhole approaches with which someone can deal with a vast variety of lesions in the neurosurgical field?In my opinion the different surgical approaches mentioned above cover almost 95% of all skull base tumors and lesions. In the following text these approaches will be described.These approaches are:1) pterional approach2) frontolateral approach3) transsphenoidal approach4) suboccipital lateral approachThese approaches can be extended and combined with each other. In the following we want to enhance this philosophy.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Martin Scholz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Parvin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jost Thissen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catharina Lohnert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Albrecht Harders</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Klaus Blaeser</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/15">
        <title>Meta-analysis of the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) on cancer risk and overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC)</title>
        <description>Background:
HPV is important in a subset of HNSCC. Our meta-analysis determined the clinical characteristics of HPV-related HNSCC.MethodPubmed search terms &quot;HPV&quot; and &quot;HNSCC&quot; were used to identify 34 studies since 1980. We obtained pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) using random or fixed-effects model and compared OS depicted in forest plot.
Results:
A total of 5681 patients were included. The prevalence of HPV+ tumors was 22%, with 86.7% of HPV16+ genotype. The OR for HNSCC in HPV16+ patients was 4.44 (95% CI = 2.87-6.02). HPV status was associated with p16 expression (adj OR = 3.00; 0.90-9.70), and HPV+ tumors were less likely to harbor p53 mutations (adj OR = 0.21; 0.04-0.38). The HR for death in HPV+ patients was 0.42 (0.27-0.57). HPV+ HNSCC also had a better response to therapy.
Conclusion:
HPV+ HNSCC are established as a separate biologic entity. Prospective trials are needed to establish the optimal therapy for HPV+ HNSCC.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Farshid Dayyani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Etzel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mei Liu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chung-Han Ho</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Lippman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Tsao</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/14">
        <title>Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection as a causative agent of fistula formation following total laryngectomy for advanced head &amp; neck cancer.</title>
        <description>AimsThe purpose of this paper was to investigate the impact of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection in the aetiology of pharyngo-cutaneous fistula (PCF) formation following total laryngectomy for advanced laryngeal cancer.
Methods:
This was a retrospective uncontrolled case study series of 31 consecutive patients based in a single institution tertiary referral head and neck oncology centre.
Results:
Pharyngo-cutaneous fistulas (PCF) following total laryngectomy occurred in 10 (32%) patients. MRSA was identified in 80% of patients with a PCF compared to 9% of patients that did not develop a fistula (p = 0.0001255 Fisher exact test). MRSA infection (p = 0.00012) and previous radiotherapy (p = 0.00025) were the only significant factors found to be important in fistula formation on multivariate analysis. Post-operative infections such as cellulitis, chest infection and carotid fistula were also associated with MRSA infections.
Conclusion:
MRSA infection following total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer can lead to potential serious complications such as PCF. Patients who underwent total laryngectomy following radiotherapy failure are at a higher risk of acquiring MRSA.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Pierre Jeannon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmad Orabi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Argyris Manganaris</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ricard Simo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/13">
        <title>Immunohistochemical expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in oral squamous cell carcinoma in relation to proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis</title>
        <description>ObjectivesSquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is by far the most common malignant neoplasm of the oral cavity. A number of etiologic factors have been implicated in its development. During the past few decades, a particular focus has been placed on the investigation of valid biomarkers predictive of cancer behavior and cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck Squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).The present study was designed to investigate the expression of epidermal growth factor in these tumors in relation to proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.Materials and methodsImmunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in 40 retrospective OSCC specimens and its correlation with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), antiapoptotic antibody (P53), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and D2-40 monoclonal antibodies (Mab), in relation to the clinicopathological parameters.
Results:
Data revealed positive EGFR immunoreactivity in 35(87.5%) cases. There was a statistically significant correlation regarding EGFR extent score with respect to intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (ILVD) (r = 0.35) as well as EGFR intensity score with respect to ILVD and peritumoral lymphatic vessel density (PLVD) (r = 0.33, r = 0.36 respectively). EGFR expression was not correlated with the clinicopathological parameters. Conclusions: EGFR is expressed by most of the cases. EGFR correlation with D2- 40 positive lymphatic vessels suggests a higher tendency of OSCC for lymphatic dissemination. Lack of correlation among the studied markers suggests their independent effect on tumor behavior.</description>
        <link>http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/2/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Seta Sarkis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bashar Abdullah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ban Abdul Majeed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nazar Talabani</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Head &amp; Neck Oncology 2010, 2:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Head &amp; Neck Oncology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1758-3284</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
